Skip to content
2019 Murder Trialtrial-daytrial-dayjury_selectionvoir_direJury Selection Day 6 - May 6, 2019Jury selection opened with capital-case instructions and individual questioning. The court excused several prospective jurors and limited questioning about non-unanimous sentencing outcomes.
← Jury Selection Day 52019 Murder TrialJury Selection Day 7 →

Jury Selection Day 6 - May 6, 2019

Jury Selection Begins With Capital-Case Instructions and Individual Voir Dire

Judge Eugene C. Griffith, Jr.
2Proceedings
2Pages
0Witnesses
3,306Lines
Jury Selection Day 6

Jury selection opened with capital-case instructions and individual questioning. The court excused several prospective jurors and limited questioning about non-unanimous sentencing outcomes.

Full day summary

The court began jury selection by swearing the first panel and explaining the five murder charges, the State's notice that it would seek the death penalty, the possible guilt and penalty phases, and Timothy R. Jones, Jr.'s not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity plea. During individual questioning, prospective jurors were examined about publicity, personal circumstances, the insanity plea, and their ability to consider life without parole and death. The court excused jurors who reported fixed views, a social-media post about the case, or an inability to consider an insanity verdict without knowing its consequence. It also ruled that counsel could discuss unanimous life or death verdicts but could not tell jurors that a non-unanimous death vote would result in life.

2. Individual Juror Voir Dire

Individual juror questioning continued, with several excusals and a ruling limiting what counsel could say about a non-unanimous death vote.

Voir Dire
Individual Juror Voir Dire
3295 lines

Individual voir dire addressed publicity, capital-sentencing views, and juror qualifications; the court also limited questioning about non-unanimous sentencing outcomes.

← Jury Selection Day 52019 Murder TrialJury Selection Day 7 →