Kennan Frederick Testimony & Transcripts - Timothy Jones Jr. Case Archive

About

Kennan Frederick, a Walmart co-manager, testified on Day 14 about using details from a September 3, 2014 receipt to identify the West Columbia store, register 33, and transaction time for surveillance footage. He authenticated the video admitted as State's Exhibit 71 and said the recorded transaction matched the receipt.

Frederick compared purchases shown in the transaction with the receipt and identified additional items admitted as State's Exhibits 138 through 142. After viewing the transaction, he said it appeared normal to him and gave him no concerns about the individual's mental status.

On cross-examination, Frederick agreed that the parking-lot footage did not reveal the SUV's make or model or identify the person entering or leaving it. He was then excused after the court clarified that State's Exhibit 71 had been admitted without objection.

Trial Record (2)

Murder2019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 – Jun 13, 2019Called by prosecution

Kennan Frederick authenticated Walmart surveillance footage on Day 14, linked it to receipt and purchase information, and described the transaction as appearing normal to him.

Day 14

May 17, 2019

DirectKennan Frederick — DirectKennan FrederickSuzanne Mayes2highlights86lines spoken

Summary

Walmart co-manager Kennan Frederick authenticated receipt-linked surveillance footage and matched the recorded transaction to listed purchases and identified items.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightFrederick explained how the store number, register number, date, and receipt time were used to locate the corresponding surveillance footage.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

testimony highlightFrederick testified that the receipt matched the register transaction and listed the purchased items, including goggles, a dust mask, saws, muriatic acid, and a five-gallon pail.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

CrossKennan Frederick — CrossKennan FrederickRobert Madsen1highlight5lines spoken

Summary

Frederick confirmed limits on the parking-lot footage; State's Exhibit 71 was clarified as admitted without objection.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightFrederick confirmed that the parking-lot footage could not identify the SUV's make or model or the person entering and leaving it, and that law enforcement did not request other available camera footage.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶