Skip to content
personpersonDonna MaddoxDonna MaddoxForensic psychiatrist who had been qualified as an expert in South Carolina courts.← All People
Expert witness

Donna Maddox

Courtroom still of Donna Maddox.

Forensic psychiatrist who had been qualified as an expert in South Carolina courts.

169 lines·6 proceedings·3 mentions

About

Donna Maddox testified for the defense on Day 29 as a qualified forensic psychiatrist. Based on evaluations that began in 2014, she diagnosed Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. with schizophrenia and described reported hallucinations, medication changes, cognitive testing, and further testing she recommended. She testified that synthetic cannabis contributed to symptoms but did not, in her opinion, account for symptoms that continued during confinement and treatment.

Maddox also described a decline in verbal-fluency testing, recommended neuropsychological testing, and later ordered an MRI. Her report was accepted as Court's Exhibit 120 for identification. She testified that Jones underreported rather than intentionally faked symptoms.

Solicitor Rick Hubbard questioned Maddox about the diagnostic basis for schizophrenia and unspecified neurocognitive disorder, later testing attributed to Dr. Kruse, medication, synthetic cannabis, and Jones's employment and daily functioning. Maddox maintained that her 2014 observations established psychosis, but said the causes of the psychosis and cognitive impairment remained uncertain. She agreed that Jones had not been observed at SCDC responding to internal stimuli or displaying disorganized thought or behavior.

On redirect, defense counsel established that Maddox had previously been retained to work for the State in another Lexington death-penalty case.

Key Points

Trial Record (6)

Trial 12019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 – Jun 13, 2019Called by defense

Defense forensic psychiatrist Donna Maddox testified on Day 29 that Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. met the criteria for schizophrenia, while describing uncertainty about the causes of his symptoms and cognitive impairment.

Day 26

Day 28

Day 29

DirectDonna Maddox β€” DirectDonna MaddoxBoyd Young3highlights32lines spoken

Summary

Dr. Donna Maddox testified that Mr. Jones met the criteria for schizophrenia and, in her opinion, was not malingering.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightDr. Maddox testified that Mr. Jones met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia based on her evaluations from 2014 through the present, despite the role she said synthetic cannabis played in his symptoms.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œMr. Jones meets the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, and I based that on my evaluations of him from 2014 until the present.”— Donna MaddoxDr. Maddox stated her diagnosis and the period of evaluations supporting it.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossDonna Maddox β€” CrossDonna MaddoxRick Hubbard2highlights132lines spoken

Summary

Maddox defended her schizophrenia diagnosis while facing questions about later testing, medication effects, functioning, and inconsistent observations.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightMaddox explained that her unspecified neurocognitive-disorder diagnosis recognized impairment without diagnosing dementia and said Dr. Brawley's earlier testing remained relevant despite later stronger results reported from Dr. Kruse.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œWith my observations, clinical training and experience, there was no question in my mind he was psychotic. The issue was what was the cause.”— Donna MaddoxMaddox stated the basis and limit of her central diagnostic opinion.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 31