Skip to content
personpersonBoyd YoungBoyd YoungDefense attorney for Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. in the 2019 Lexington County trial.← All People
Defense

Boyd Young

Courtroom still of Boyd Young.

Defense attorney for Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. in the 2019 Lexington County trial.

5,331 lines·143 proceedings·1 mention

About

Boyd Young represented Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. and was a principal advocate for the insanity defense. During jury selection, he pressed whether prospective jurors could consider both an insanity verdict and life without parole, while the court set limits on the questions.

In guilt-phase cross-examinations, Young tested witnesses' observations of Jones's mental condition and challenged the reliability and completeness of investigative accounts. He elicited that an initial conversation was unrecorded and undocumented, questioned errors and an unrecorded portion of an FBI interview, compared a correctional officer's timeline with medical records, and established that a phone report selected 1,240 artifacts from roughly 24,750 data points. He also questioned the forensic pathologist about decomposition limits and changes to cause-of-death certificates.

As the defense presented its case, Young developed evidence about brain injury, psychiatric symptoms, and criminal responsibility. His examinations of Travis Snyder and Erin Bigler addressed imaging findings, cumulative effects of brain injury, behavioral and emotional regulation, and a revised hypothetical involving family history, scan findings, and reported hallucinations. He questioned April Hames about counseling records, reported symptoms, and possible masking of schizophrenia symptoms; Beverly Wood about treatment and a schizo-affective-disorder diagnosis; and Julie Dorney about collateral sources and her criminal-responsibility opinion supporting the insanity defense.

In his Day 24 closing argument, Young asked jurors to consider brain images, expert testimony, medical records, recordings, and Jones's statements together. He argued that family history, adverse environment, traumatic brain injury, mental-health symptoms, and the effects of Spice and Chantix supported a finding of legal insanity. He also challenged what he described as the State's selective use of Jones's incriminating statements and reliance on changed or unrecorded accounts while discounting evidence of voices, paranoia, and psychosis.

In the penalty phase, Young shifted the defense presentation to life without parole. His opening asked jurors to consider Jones's whole life, and his examinations covered spiritual life, schizophrenia, testing related to malingering, family relationships, and pleas for mercy.

Trial Record (143)

Murder2019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 โ€“ Jun 13, 2019

Boyd Young represented Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. at trial, developing the insanity defense through expert and fact-witness examinations, challenging investigative and forensic evidence, and arguing that mental illness, traumatic brain injury, and psychosis prevented Jones from appreciating legal or moral wrongfulness. In the penalty phase, he presented mental-health and mercy evidence and argued for life without parole while preserving disputes over graphic exhibits and mitigation instructions.

Jury Selection Day 1

Jury Selection Day 2

Jury Selection Day 3

jury selectionJury selection169lines spoken

Summary

Prospective jurors were examined on capital sentencing views, publicity, and impartiality; the court qualified some, excused others, and set limits on voir dire questioning.

Jury Selection Day 4

jury selectionJury selection228lines spoken

Summary

Voir dire examined insanity, death-penalty views, and juror impartiality; the court excused several jurors, qualified others, and set limits on deliberation-related questioning.

Jury Selection Day 5

Jury Selection Day 6

Jury Selection Day 7

Jury Selection Day 8

Jury Selection Day 9

Jury Selection Day 10

Day 11

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

Day 20

Day 21

Day 22

Day 23

Day 24

ClosingDefense Closing Argument by Boyd YoungBoyd Young7highlights10lines spoken

Summary

Young urged jurors to find Tim legally insane, arguing that mental illness, brain injury, and psychosis explained the deaths.

Highlights (7)

otherYoung framed the defense's final position as insanity, arguing that psychosis prevented Tim from appreciating the wrongfulness of the conduct.Open in transcript →
otherYoung connected the defense theory to asserted genetic risk, childhood environment, and traumatic brain injury.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œKilling children that you love is insane.โ€— Boyd YoungYoung used this refrain to state the defense's central insanity theory.Open in transcript →
confrontationYoung challenged the State's reading of Tim's statements and post-offense conduct, urging jurors to consider the defense's account of psychosis and irrational behavior.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Show all 7 highlights
Quoteโ€œBelieve Tim when he says he strangled the kids, but don't believe him when he says he didn't intend to kill Nahtahn.โ€— Boyd YoungYoung characterized the State's approach as selectively accepting the defendant's statements.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteโ€œKilling someone out of murder -- out of hatred is murder. Killing children out of love is insanity.โ€— Boyd YoungYoung's closing contrast summarized the defense's moral and legal framing.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 31

Day 32