Skip to content
personpersonJessie LaintzJessie LaintzLexington County sheriff's lieutenant who worked on the missing-children investigation.← All People
Law enforcement

Jessie Laintz

Courtroom still of Jessie Laintz.

Lexington County sheriff's lieutenant who worked on the missing-children investigation.

92 lines·8 proceedings·3 mentions

About

Lieutenant Jessie Laintz testified for the prosecution on Day 11 and Day 12 about investigative work involving a Samsung Galaxy Note Three and the search for the missing children. She described a 2018 warrant seeking a physical extraction of the phone after it had previously been collected, explaining that newer forensic capabilities could recover a broader range of data, including potentially deleted material. She also described the return documenting physical and file-system images of the phone and a logical image of its SIM card.

Laintz further described the response after concern arose that the children were missing: deputies conducted a welfare check, entered the children into NCIC, and attempted to contact people connected to the case. She testified that Mississippi authorities later reported locating the Escalade and the defendant.

On cross-examination, defense counsel explored Laintz's supervisory role, when she became involved, the early focus on possible mental illness, and efforts to build a travel timeline from receipt information. She said she became more involved after the car and defendant were found without the children, and that possible undiagnosed mental illness was not her focus when she began working the case. The court admitted Defendant's Exhibit 7, a whiteboard summary created from receipt information. On redirect and recross, Laintz addressed the limited early information about the reported possible illness and said investigators did not then know the children were dead.

Key Points

Trial Record (8)

Trial 12019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 โ€“ Jun 13, 2019Called by prosecution

Lieutenant Jessie Laintz testified about the renewed forensic examination of a Samsung phone and the law-enforcement response after the children were reported missing. Defense questioning addressed the investigation's early focus, receipt-based timeline work, and what investigators knew at the time.

Day 11

DirectJessie Laintz โ€” DirectJessie LaintzSuzanne Mayes2highlights30lines spoken

Summary

Laintz described a 2018 warrant and physical extraction of a phone, including efforts to recover deleted data.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightLaintz described obtaining a 2018 warrant for a physical extraction of the phone after an earlier logical extraction, explaining that the later extraction could potentially recover deleted data.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œWell, the first search warrant that was done on this phone, it was a logical that was done. So physical and the advanced technology and almost five years, another search warrant was done on this same phone to get a physical and actually collect the deleted data.โ€— Jessie LaintzLaintz distinguished the earlier logical extraction from the later physical extraction sought to collect deleted data.Open in transcript →

Day 12

CrossJessie Laintz โ€” CrossJessie LaintzRobert Madsen3highlights38lines spoken

Summary

Laintz described the investigation's early focus and receipt-based travel timeline; the court admitted a whiteboard summary as Defendant's Exhibit number 7.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightLaintz explained that she became more involved after the car and defendant were located without the children, and that the investigation had not initially drawn significant attention from her.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteโ€œI wouldn't say I didn't know anything about it. There was nothing that was causing a lot of my attention.โ€— Jessie LaintzLaintz qualified the extent of her early awareness and involvement in the investigation.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteโ€œSo that was very early in our investigation when we started doing that white board.โ€— Jessie LaintzLaintz characterized the exhibit as an early receipt-based timeline rather than a later, complete reconstruction.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 15