Skip to content
personpersonKimberly KruseKimberly KruseClinical neuropsychologist who worked as chief neuropsychologist at Prisma Health.← All People
Expert witness

Kimberly Kruse

Courtroom still of Kimberly Kruse.

Clinical neuropsychologist who worked as chief neuropsychologist at Prisma Health.

282 lines·21 proceedings·17 mentions

About

Kimberly Kruse testified on Day 24 after the court qualified her as an expert in neuropsychology. She described an evaluation of Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. conducted for Dr. Richard Frierson and explained the effort, validity, cognitive, symptom-validity, and personality testing she used.

Kruse testified that her results did not support a neurocognitive disorder or an organic psychosis. She attributed differences from Dr. Tora Brawley's earlier testing to Geodon-related slowing and depression, and described an unspecified personality disorder with primarily antisocial and borderline traits.

Her testimony included findings she considered consistent with unreliable symptom reporting and malingering, including results from measures directed at reported psychotic symptoms. On redirect, she reaffirmed those opinions and said multiple measures were consistent. On recross, the defense elicited that the SIMS total score was 12, below the stated cutoff of 16, while Kruse maintained that one domain showed exaggerated psychotic symptoms. The court declined further follow-up and excused her.

Key Points

Trial Record (21)

Trial 12019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 – Jun 13, 2019Called by prosecution

Kimberly Kruse testified as a qualified neuropsychology expert on Day 24 about her evaluation and testing of Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. Her opinions did not support clinically significant neurocognitive impairment or psychosis and included malingering-related findings.

Day 16

Day 19

Day 22

Day 23

Day 24

CrossKimberly Kruse — CrossKimberly KruseCasey Secor1highlight116lines spoken

Summary

Defense counsel challenged Dr. Kruse's interpretation of psychological testing, while she maintained that the defendant overreported psychotic symptoms but gave full effort on cognitive tests.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightDr. Kruse explained that she relied on standardized scores and her own interpretation rather than computer-generated narrative reports, although she could use relevant phrasing from them in her report.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
RedirectKimberly Kruse — RedirectKimberly KruseRick Hubbard1highlight25lines spoken

Summary

Dr. Kruse reaffirmed opinions of no clinically significant neurocognitive impairment or organic psychosis and testified that testing supported malingering.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightDr. Kruse testified that she did not believe Tim Jones had clinically significant neurocognitive impairment and attributed differences from Dr. Brawley's testing to Geodon-related slowing and depression.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 26

Day 27

ProceduralPenalty-Phase Evidence RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court admitted disputed Alabama recovery photographs subject to objection and incorporated first-phase evidence into the penalty phase, deferring a limiting-instruction decision.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 32