Skip to content
2019 Murder TrialtranscripttranscriptStephanie Stanley — Direct - Day 15 - 2019 Murder TrialSLED DNA analyst Stephanie Stanley reported testing results from evidence associated with the Jones children after the parties entered related stipulations.
Shawn GrahamSuzanne MayesBoyd YoungEugene C. Griffith, Jr.Stephanie StanleyTHE COURTShawn GrahamCourt ClerkStephanie StanleyBoyd YoungCourt ReporterSuzanne Mayesproceduraldirect
15 pages·8 witnesses·2,299 lines
DNA analyst Stephanie Stanley, forensic pathologist Janice Ross, and Amber Kyzer testified. The court denied a mistrial motion after Kyzer became distressed on the stand.
Jury Admonition and Trial Resumption
ProceduralProc.Jury Admonition and Trial Resumption

May 20, 2019.

THE COURT: Let's bring the jury in. (Whereupon, the jury came into open court at approximately 9:03 a.m.)

THE COURT: All right. Be seated. All right. I hope you all had a good weekend. Excellent weather, wasn't it. And I hope you all got some rest. We will start here in the next bit. I told you I would ask you, and I'm going to preface by asking you if anybody contacted you or have any -- anything that intervened with your oath to keep your facts received from here in the courtroom and not outside. I want you to receive everything here and not influenced from anything outside. If somebody thinks they've been influenced, has any issue, I'll bring you up and we'll make a record without the presence of everyone else. Okay? I don't want you to think you got to sit here and stand up and say this is what happened and have a -- we'll deal with it in a private session. Anybody have any issue they need to speak with me about? We need to make a record of it? Everybody good? Everybody still ready to listen today? (Whereupon, a nonverbal affirmative response from the jury.)

THE COURT: Very good, all right. We'll begin. The State's still up. Call your witness please.

SHAWN GRAHAM: The State calls Stephanie Stanley.

DirectDirectStephanie Stanley — Direct Stephanie Stanley Shawn Graham

STEPHANIE STANLEY, being first duly sworn, testified as follows:

COURT CLERK: Have a seat on the stand, and state your name for the record, spelling your last.

STEPHANIE STANLEY: My name is Stephanie Stanley, S-t-a-n-l-e-y.

DIRECT EXAMINATION By Mr. Graham:

SHAWN GRAHAM: Ms. Stanley, where are you employed, ma'am?

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I'm employed by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, more commonly referred to as SLED.

SHAWN GRAHAM: How long have you been employed with SLED?

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I've been employed with SLED in the DNA casework department since February of 2005.

SHAWN GRAHAM: So that would be how many years now?

STEPHANIE STANLEY: A little over 14.

160:00

SHAWN GRAHAM: Fourteen years now. And your job, you said you're in the DNA department?

170:05
180:05

SHAWN GRAHAM: Would you describe to the jury your background and education in DNA and serology.

190:10

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I have a Bachelor's of Science degree from Clemson University. I completed a training program at SLED where I learned evidence handling, serology, or the identification of body fluids. I learned DNA analysis, extraction, quantitation and amplification of DNA, DNA interpretation, and statistics as it relates to DNA analysis.

200:32

SHAWN GRAHAM: And have you ever been qualified as an expert in South Carolina in the fields of DNA examination and interpretation?

210:38
220:39

SHAWN GRAHAM: Approximately how many times?

230:41

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Approximately 35.

240:41

SHAWN GRAHAM: Your Honor, the State would offer Stephanie Stanley as an expert in the field of DNA examination.

250:47

BOYD YOUNG: No objection.

260:48

THE COURT: No objection. Ms. Stanley is qualified to give testimony regarding DNA analysis in that field. Carry on.

270:55

SHAWN GRAHAM: Thank you, Your Honor.

280:57

SHAWN GRAHAM: Ms. Stanley, if you could pull the mic a little bit closer to you and speak a little bit louder.

291:00
301:01

SHAWN GRAHAM: In general terms, would you explain to the jury what DNA is and what serology is.

311:06

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Let me start with serology, because serology is the identification of body fluids. Typically the body fluids that we're talking about are blood, semen and saliva, for their use in DNA testing. So once we identify something as potential blood, semen or saliva, we attempt to identify a DNA profile from that item. DNA is a chemical that's found in all of our cells, with the exception of your red blood cells, and half of your DNA comes from your mom, and half of your DNA comes from your dad. Most of our DNA, among humans, is the same. But in forensics we're interested in a very small portion of our DNA that's different which allows us to tell individuals apart from one another. In our lab we looked at 15 locations on the DNA, and the information from all those locations combined gives us what is known as a DNA profile. And no two people have the same DNA profile, with the exception of identical twins.

321:57

COURT REPORTER: Can you slow down some?

331:59

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Yes, ma'am.

342:04

SHAWN GRAHAM: Your Honor, for the record, the Defense has stipulated to the chain of custody as far as material coming to Ms. Stanley for analysis.

352:10

BOYD YOUNG: That's correct.

362:11

THE COURT: We put that on the record earlier, being transported from Alabama over to Columbia.

372:16

SHAWN GRAHAM: And additionally, some of the analysis that Ms. Stanley would have done actually went to the identification of the children which was also stipulated, too, by the Defense as well.

382:24

THE COURT: Which went over Friday afternoon late.

392:26

BOYD YOUNG: That's correct.

402:27

THE COURT: Okay. You all understand they've agreed to the chain, hand-to-hand bringing of the samples to her office. And then also to the identification back to the lady who testified last. All that was agreed to as it got passed along, chain-by-chain link consistently and correctly. They agree to that. So that's what all that meant.

412:47

SHAWN GRAHAM: Ms. Stanley, you analyzed numerous items on this case. Isn't that correct?

422:51
432:52

SHAWN GRAHAM: Today I want to talk to you specifically about six items. This is a photograph, State's 112. It is a five gallon blue Walmart bucket. That item was sent to SLED for processing. And it was item 64, I believe, of SLED. Is that correct?

443:38
453:40

SHAWN GRAHAM: Now, there is a swab taken from the handle of the bucket, which would be known as 64.1. Is that correct?

463:46
473:46

SHAWN GRAHAM: Would you describe to the jury what, if any, analysis that you did on the swab taken from the handle of the bucket and what results you found?

483:55

STEPHANIE STANLEY: DNA analysis was performed on item 64.1, which were the swabs taken from the handle of the bucket. And the partial DNA profile developed from that item matches the DNA profile of Merah Jones. And the probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual having a DNA profile matching this partial DNA profile on this item is 1 in approximately 83,000.

494:29

SHAWN GRAHAM: State's 123 is a photograph of what can be described as biological matter taken from the trunk area of the Cadillac Escalade by Stacy Jones. That would be SLED number 98.

504:44
514:45

SHAWN GRAHAM: Would you describe to the jury what, if any, analysis was performed on that and what result, if any, you found?

524:50

STEPHANIE STANLEY: DNA analysis was performed on this item and the partial DNA profile developed from item number 98, the piece of biological material, matches the DNA profile of Elias Jones. The probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual having a DNA profile matching this partial DNA profile is approximately 1 in 44 billion.

SHAWN GRAHAM: One in 44?

555:28

SHAWN GRAHAM: State's number 78 is described as a swab collected from the center console of the Cadillac Escalade by Stacy Jones. That is, I believe, 102 for SLED.

565:43
575:44

SHAWN GRAHAM: Would you describe what examination you did and what results you found?

585:48

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I first checked the item to see if there was any chance that the item had blood on it and presumptive testing for blood was positive. I then performed DNA analysis --

595:57

SHAWN GRAHAM: Let me stop you for just a second. When you say you tested presumptive for blood, would you explain to the jury what that is and what it means?

606:07

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Yes, sir. This item is -- came to me in the form of swabs. I would have taken a snippet of that item and preformed a chemical test that reacts positive if blood could be present.

616:17

SHAWN GRAHAM: After you did the presumptive positive test for blood, then describe what you did.

626:24

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I performed DNA analysis on this item, and the DNA profile developed from item 102 matches the DNA profile of Nahtahn Jones. The probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual having a DNA profile matching this item is approximately one in 370 quadrillion.

636:49

COURT REPORTER: 370 --

646:50

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Quadrillion.

656:51

SHAWN GRAHAM: The numbers go billion, trillion --

666:54

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Right. Million, billion, trillion, quadrillion.

676:58

SHAWN GRAHAM: I'm going to show three photographs, 124, 126 and 128. Those are photographs of -- this is a bag containing a white pillow that was collected by Stacy Jones. 126 is a photograph of the pillow itself with writing on the photograph, on the pillow. Do you recognize that being the handwriting of Verinna Rivera?

687:29
697:30

SHAWN GRAHAM: Okay. Who is she?

707:32

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Verinna Rivera is a forensic serologist in the DNA casework department.

717:37

SHAWN GRAHAM: So for this item she would have done something before it came to you?

737:41

SHAWN GRAHAM: What did she do?

747:43

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Verinna would have looked at this item. Anything that's much larger than a swab or a cutting goes to our serology section and they're going to look for biological material, those biological stains. And once they're identified they would take a cutting. As you can see next to that 110.1 there's a hole. She would have taken a cutting from that area and forwarded it back to me for analysis.

758:04

SHAWN GRAHAM: Once you got item 110.1, which was a cutting from the pillow casing from the Escalade what, if anything, did you do with it?

768:12

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I performed DNA testing on that item.

778:15

SHAWN GRAHAM: And what, if anything, did you find?

788:17

STEPHANIE STANLEY: The partial DNA profile developed from item 110.1, which is the cutting from the pillow, matches the DNA profile of Gabriel Jones. The probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual having a DNA profile matching this item is approximately one in 28 quadrillion.

798:43

SHAWN GRAHAM: State's 131, a photograph of a sun shade collected from the vehicle. I believe the SLED item that would correspond with that is 89. Is that correct?

808:57

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Yes, sir. It is.

818:59

SHAWN GRAHAM: And then 89.1 would have been what?

829:02

STEPHANIE STANLEY: 89.1 would have been swabs collected from that sun shade.

839:07

SHAWN GRAHAM: And what, if any, analysis did you do on the swab that was collected from the sun shade?

849:13

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I performed DNA analysis on that item.

859:15

SHAWN GRAHAM: And what were your results?

869:17

STEPHANIE STANLEY: The DNA profile developed from 89.1 matches the DNA profile of Abigail Jones. The probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual having a DNA profile matching this item is approximately 1 in 34 quadrillion -- I'm sorry, quintillion.

879:40

SHAWN GRAHAM: And then finally let me show you what's been marked as State's 168. Let me get you a pair of gloves.

STEPHANIE STANLEY: I have got some.

8910:37

SHAWN GRAHAM: If you would open the box. And do you recognize that item?

9010:39
9110:41

SHAWN GRAHAM: And that's item -- SLED item 77, correct?

9210:43
9310:44

SHAWN GRAHAM: And that's described as a belt with a broken buckle that was collected from the Defendant's vehicle, correct?

9410:51
9510:53

SHAWN GRAHAM: Your Honor, if I could ask the witness to step down from the stand.

9610:56

THE COURT: Sure. Sure. (Whereupon, the witness stepped down from the witness stand.)

9711:03

SHAWN GRAHAM: When we describe this as a broken belt buckle, would you describe to the jury what we're talking about?

9811:07

STEPHANIE STANLEY: This portion right there, when it was submitted for analysis, was not intact.

9911:12

SHAWN GRAHAM: Can you describe that?

10011:18

STEPHANIE STANLEY: When it was submitted for analysis it was not intact.

10111:26

SHAWN GRAHAM: Looking at the belt, there's gray numbering on both sides of the buckle. Can you explain to the jury what the numbering represents.

10211:36

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Yes. Forensic serologist, Verinna Rivera, would have swabbed this item. You can see where one portion starts and stops. This is 772.1, 772.2. A lot of times items like this, we will swab the inside portion separate from the outside portion. And we were trying to identify probably two portions.

10312:01

SHAWN GRAHAM: And on the inside as well, the numbers are repeated.

10412:03
10512:07

SHAWN GRAHAM: Looking at your -- you can have a seat. Thank you. (Whereupon, the witness returns to the witness stand.)

10612:14

SHAWN GRAHAM: And this is State's 168, for the record. Can you describe to the jury what, if any, analysis you performed on 77.2.1 which was a middle swab from the buckle.

10712:32

STEPHANIE STANLEY: Yes, sir. I performed DNA analysis on that item.

10812:35

SHAWN GRAHAM: And what, if anything, were the results of that analysis?

10912:38

STEPHANIE STANLEY: The DNA profile developed from 77.2.1 is a mixture of at least two individuals. A DNA mixture simply means that more than one person is contributing DNA from that item. The partial DNA profile of the major contributor, or who's contributing the most of that item, matches the DNA profile of Gabriel Jones. The probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual having a DNA profile matching the major contributor to this item is approximately 1 in 570,000.

11013:12

SHAWN GRAHAM: Thank you, Ms. Stanley. Please answer any questions the Defense has for you.

11113:18

BOYD YOUNG: No questions.

11213:19

THE COURT: Thank you very much, Ms. Stanley. (Whereupon, the witness stepped down from the witness stand.)

11313:35

SUZANNE MAYES: The State calls Karen Leonhardt.

Continue to next page2.Karen Leonhardt — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross