Skip to content
personpersonShawn GrahamShawn GrahamDeputy solicitor who represented the State of South Carolina in the 2019 Jones trial.← All People
ProsecutionEleventh Circuit Solicitor's Office

Shawn Graham

Courtroom still of Shawn Graham.

Deputy solicitor who represented the State of South Carolina in the 2019 Jones trial.

3,248 lines·77 proceedings

About

Shawn Graham, a deputy solicitor for the State, delivered its opening statement and presented evidence across the guilt phase. He told jurors how the State expected to prove the children's deaths and respond to the insanity defense.

Graham examined investigators and forensic witnesses about the missing-person response, the Mississippi checkpoint, evidence collected from the Cadillac Escalade, AB Pinaca found in seized material, the Alabama recovery site, and DNA results. Through digital-forensics testimony, he traced phone calls, messages, searches, web history, and device events. On redirect, he asked about searches related to schizophrenia and whether the phone record contained specified searches suggesting threats from the children.

His cross-examinations pressed the limits of mental-health evidence. Neuroradiologist Travis Snyder agreed that MRI findings alone could not diagnose a psychiatric illness or show how Jones functioned, while maintaining that the scan showed traumatic brain injury. Counselor April Hames said she had not observed delusions or hallucinations during counseling. Graham elicited psychiatrist Richard Frierson's opinion that reported symptoms were substance-induced and had resolved, and challenged Dr. Julie Dorney's diagnosis through symptom-validity testing, substance use, reported beliefs, and conduct after the deaths. Dorney maintained her central opinion while acknowledging limits in the record.

During the penalty phase, Graham presented phone videos and a redacted jail call and tested mitigation witnesses on when and under what conditions they had observed Jones. His questioning distinguished long-standing family impressions from what those witnesses knew about Jones's later mental health, drug use, or conduct.

Trial Record (77)

Murder2019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 – Jun 13, 2019

Shawn Graham prosecuted the case through capital voir dire, the State's opening, presentation of investigative and forensic evidence, and cross-examination of defense mental-health witnesses. His questioning tested whether imaging and psychiatric opinions established mental illness or criminal incapacity, while developing evidence about substance use, functioning, digital activity, and conduct after the deaths.

Jury Selection Day 3

jury selectionJury selection17lines spoken

Summary

Prospective jurors were examined on capital sentencing views, publicity, and impartiality; the court qualified some, excused others, and set limits on voir dire questioning.

Jury Selection Day 4

jury selectionJury selection36lines spoken

Summary

Voir dire examined insanity, death-penalty views, and juror impartiality; the court excused several jurors, qualified others, and set limits on deliberation-related questioning.

Jury Selection Day 5

Jury Selection Day 6

Jury Selection Day 7

Jury Selection Day 8

Jury Selection Day 9

Jury Selection Day 10

Day 11

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

Day 20

Day 21

Day 22

Day 23

Day 25

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 31

Day 32