Shawn Graham prosecuted the case through capital voir dire, the State's opening, presentation of investigative and forensic evidence, and cross-examination of defense mental-health witnesses. His questioning tested whether imaging and psychiatric opinions established mental illness or criminal incapacity, while developing evidence about substance use, functioning, digital activity, and conduct after the deaths.
Shawn Graham

Deputy solicitor who represented the State of South Carolina in the 2019 Jones trial.
About
Shawn Graham, a deputy solicitor for the State, delivered its opening statement and presented evidence across the guilt phase. He told jurors how the State expected to prove the children's deaths and respond to the insanity defense.
Graham examined investigators and forensic witnesses about the missing-person response, the Mississippi checkpoint, evidence collected from the Cadillac Escalade, AB Pinaca found in seized material, the Alabama recovery site, and DNA results. Through digital-forensics testimony, he traced phone calls, messages, searches, web history, and device events. On redirect, he asked about searches related to schizophrenia and whether the phone record contained specified searches suggesting threats from the children.
His cross-examinations pressed the limits of mental-health evidence. Neuroradiologist Travis Snyder agreed that MRI findings alone could not diagnose a psychiatric illness or show how Jones functioned, while maintaining that the scan showed traumatic brain injury. Counselor April Hames said she had not observed delusions or hallucinations during counseling. Graham elicited psychiatrist Richard Frierson's opinion that reported symptoms were substance-induced and had resolved, and challenged Dr. Julie Dorney's diagnosis through symptom-validity testing, substance use, reported beliefs, and conduct after the deaths. Dorney maintained her central opinion while acknowledging limits in the record.
During the penalty phase, Graham presented phone videos and a redacted jail call and tested mitigation witnesses on when and under what conditions they had observed Jones. His questioning distinguished long-standing family impressions from what those witnesses knew about Jones's later mental health, drug use, or conduct.
Trial Record (77)
No proceedings match this filter.