Skip to content
Timothy Jones Jr.- Case Archive
personpersonBrice MankowskiBrice MankowskiFormer Intel teammate of Timothy Ray Jones, Jr., whom he worked with for about two and a half years.← All People
Witness

Brice Mankowski

Courtroom still of Brice Mankowski.

Former Intel teammate of Timothy Ray Jones, Jr., whom he worked with for about two and a half years.

Appeared2019 Murder Trial
57 lines·4 proceedings·2 mentions

About

Brice Mankowski testified for the defense on Day 20 about his experience working with Timothy Jones at Intel. He described Jones as social and intensely opinionated but generally not mean, and recounted an agitated workplace encounter during the summer of 2014.

Mankowski also described later workplace changes, including tardiness, missed meetings, unexplained absences, and reasoning he considered irrational. He said he had not felt physically threatened during the workplace encounter, although he believed confrontation could have escalated it.

On cross-examination, Mankowski said disagreements with Jones were generally work-related and sometimes concerned financial interests. He qualified the timing of the changes, and said he did not know of alleged spice use or observe violent outbursts or a loss of emotional control during team meetings.

Key Points

Trial Record (4)

Trial 12019 Murder TrialApr 29, 2019 – Jun 13, 2019Called by defense

Brice Mankowski testified for the defense about workplace observations of Timothy Jones at Intel, including an agitated 2014 encounter and later attendance changes. Cross-examination addressed the timing and limits of those observations.

Day 12

Day 20

DirectBrice Mankowski — DirectBrice MankowskiCasey Secor4highlights24lines spoken

Summary

Former coworker Brice Mankowski described Tim's workplace demeanor, a 2014 agitated encounter, and increasingly erratic attendance at Intel.

Highlights (4)

testimony highlightMankowski described a summer 2014 workplace encounter in which Tim appeared agitated and intensely spoke without stopping; Mankowski said he did not feel physically threatened but believed confrontation could have led to violence or loss of control.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“Had I been more confrontational or had I disagreed with him in any way, I could easily have seen him becoming violent or not being able to control how he felt at that time.”— Brice MankowskiMankowski qualified his account of the 2014 encounter: he did not feel physically threatened, but believed a confrontation might have escalated.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
testimony highlightMankowski testified that Tim's attendance changed during summer 2014 from arriving early to tardiness, missed meetings, and increasingly unexplained absences.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“So, in general, it was an irrational way of thinking.”— Brice MankowskiMankowski gave his overall assessment of Tim's reasoning based on their workplace interactions.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossBrice Mankowski — CrossBrice MankowskiSuzanne Mayes2highlights33lines spoken

Summary

Mankowski narrowed his workplace observations to summer 2014 and said he did not know of alleged spice use or see violent outbursts in team meetings.

Highlights (2)

Quote“So I never discussed religion with Tim. It was usually about work-related things. I guess, sometimes it might have been financial-related things.”— Brice MankowskiClarifies the limited subjects underlying Mankowski's testimony about Tim's opinions and disagreements.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶