6.Dustin Smith — Direct/Cross/Redirect
175 linesDUSTIN SMITH, being first duly sworn, testified as follows:
COURT CLERK: Please have a seat, and if you'll state your name and spell your last name for the record.
DUSTIN SMITH: My name is Lieutenant Dustin Smith.
SUZANNE MAYES: May it please the Court.
DIRECT EXAMINATION By Ms. Mayes:
SUZANNE MAYES: Lieutenant Smith, can you state your full name for the record.
DUSTIN SMITH: Sure. My name is Lieutenant Dustin Smith, S-M-I-T-H.
SUZANNE MAYES: Tell us -- tell us a little bit about yourself. Where are you currently employed and in what capacity.
DUSTIN SMITH: I am the current Forensic Toxicology Supervisor and Chief Toxicologist at the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, commonly known as SLED.
SUZANNE MAYES: What can you tell us about your educational background that led you to the field of toxicology?
DUSTIN SMITH: Sure. I have a Bachelor's of Science in Biology with a Minor in Chemistry from the College of Charleston. Since that point I've undergone extensive internal and external training both within the forensic toxicology laboratory at the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and at multiple courses and classes outside of the laboratory. I am also a member of the Technology Working Group through the National Institute of Justice. I sit on the most recent forum to determine the best practices forensic, for forensic DUI casework sponsored by the National Safety Council. And I am certified as a Fellow of the American Board of Forensic Toxicology.
SUZANNE MAYES: All right. And, Lieutenant Smith, if you could pull the microphone just a little bit closer.
DUSTIN SMITH: Sorry.
SUZANNE MAYES: You mentioned that you were a Chief Toxicologist at the State Law Enforcement Division?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, ma'am. That's correct.
SUZANNE MAYES: What does that job entail?
DUSTIN SMITH: So I oversee the toxicology department. I receive the day-to-day operations from budget and personnel. I also am responsible for the training of new technicians and toxicologists. I'm responsible for method development and validation in the laboratory, and I'm responsible for reviewing all casework that involves any drug work before those finalized reports are released back to the submitting agencies.
SUZANNE MAYES: Is it possible to give us an overview of your training in the field of forensic toxicology?
DUSTIN SMITH: Like I said before, I have undergone extensive training inside and outside. So inside the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division toxicology department, I have been certified as a Forensic Toxicologist. Externally I routinely attend the Society of Forensic Toxicologist meetings where there are courses that keep me current with the field of forensic toxicology. I have attended both the Borkenstein alcohol and driving and drugs and driving courses, and course work.
SUZANNE MAYES: And, Lieutenant Smith, can you tell us whether or not you have been qualified previously as an expert in the field of forensic toxicology?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, I have.
SUZANNE MAYES: Is it possible to estimate how many such times you've been qualified as an expert in courts of South Carolina?
DUSTIN SMITH: Approximately 100 times.
SUZANNE MAYES: Your Honor, at this time the State offers Lieutenant Dustin Smith as an expert in the field of forensic toxicology.
THE COURT: Any voir dire?
ROBERT MADSEN: No.
THE COURT: All right. Lieutenant Smith is qualified as an expert in the field of forensic toxicology and may testify and offer opinions in that field because of his training and experience.
SUZANNE MAYES: So, Lieutenant Smith, I'm going to start by asking about this drug, we've heard some about it this morning, specifically, synthetic cannabis.
DUSTIN SMITH: Okay. So just to kind of go over briefly what synthetic cannabis, or synthetic cannabinoids are. It's the same thing as spice, or K2. Those are kind of colloquial terms for it. Synthetic cannabinoids were first produced in order to predate a legal alternative to marijuana. The first compounds that were produced very closely mirrored the effects of marijuana. Very similar psychoactive effects. They were -- they interacted with the same receptors and to the same extent as marijuana does. As those compounds began becoming scheduled, or becoming illegal, the clandestine drug manufacturers would move on to another suite of compounds. And the next suite of compounds had effects that were also similar but not quite the same, and then the next set would get a little bit further from the true marijuana effects, and then so on and so on. At this point we're to the tenth or eleventh or twelfth iteration of those compounds. It's a revolving door. As soon as one suite of compounds becomes established, the governments will make the determinations that those are dangerous, they will make those illegal, and then the clandestine labs will create new drugs after that.
SUZANNE MAYES: And, Lieutenant Smith, was AB Pinaca ever one of the drugs that contained within synthetic cannabinoid?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, it was.
SUZANNE MAYES: And today in South Carolina is this drug, AB Pinaca, legal or illegal?
DUSTIN SMITH: It is -- it is federally illegal.
SUZANNE MAYES: When did it become a controlled substance in South Carolina?
DUSTIN SMITH: It became a controlled substance through the federal government on January 1st, 2015.
SUZANNE MAYES: Prior to that, January 2015, do you know or have personal knowledge through your education and training whether this drug was sold in South Carolina at head shops and things of that nature?
DUSTIN SMITH: We certainly did see it in our casework, yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: Lieutenant Smith, have there been published studies on the effects of AB Pinaca among professionals in your field?
DUSTIN SMITH: There have been. The studies are limited, but there have been studies. Like I said before, the problem with synthetic cannabinoids and the study of synthetic cannabinoids is that they don't hang around for long. So by the time that the studies get completed it's not pertinent any longer because they've moved on to the next suit of compounds. But yes, there have been some studies that have been done on various suits of synthetic cannabinoids including AB Pinaca.
SUZANNE MAYES: Are the studies accepted by professionals in the field of toxicology?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, they are.
SUZANNE MAYES: And subject to peer review?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: Are you familiar with these studies?
DUSTIN SMITH: I am.
SUZANNE MAYES: I'm going to ask you specifically about some of the known effects of AB Pinaca on the user.
DUSTIN SMITH: So by the time AB Pinaca, the iteration of synthetic cannabinoids that included AB Pinaca came onto the market, we're pretty far away now from traditional marijuana. The effects aren't terribly similar any longer. Obviously you take one of these drugs, or any illicit drug for the euphoric effects of the drugs. You want to take a drug because you want to feel good. So one of the primary effects of the drug is that -- still is euphoria. Sort of the side-effects of the drug, which are interesting because they differ so much from the traditional marijuana, include agitation, can include --
SUZANNE MAYES: I'm going to need you to slow down just a little bit.
DUSTIN SMITH: Okay.
SUZANNE MAYES: Agitation.
DUSTIN SMITH: Confusion, anxiety. They can include paranoia, and they can include hallucinations. And one of the -- one of the interesting things that really is specific to some of the later iterations of synthetic cannabinoids, which AB Pinaca is a member of, are psychosis or altered mental state. So both of those two things would be big things that would be associated with it.
SUZANNE MAYES: All right. And so, just to clarify and follow-up a little bit more. Psychosis or an altered mental state?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct.
SUZANNE MAYES: These side-effects have been noted throughout the literature?
DUSTIN SMITH: They have. They are consistent with the use of AB Pinaca.
SUZANNE MAYES: In addition to those side-effects, let me ask you, what type of physiological effects the drug is known to have?
DUSTIN SMITH: Sure. So the synthetic cannabinoids are interesting in that they don't -- typical drugs will usually go one way or the other. They're either going to be a central nervous depressant, like alcohol or opioids, or they'll be a central nervous system stimulant like cocaine or methamphetamine. Synthetic cannabinoids kind of share some from each. So some of the central nervous system depressant like effects that you expect to see include things like lethargy, which means you move very slowly, drowsiness, slurred speech, some -- those are the primary ones that would be associated with the central nervous system depressant side. As far as the central nervous system stimulant side goes, you can experience increased heart rate, although there are instances where you can also experience decreased heart rate. A lot of these symptoms are dose specific also. Sometimes you may exhibit one suite of symptoms at a lower dose of the drug and then you may exhibit a different suite of symptoms at a higher dose of the drug.
SUZANNE MAYES: All right. So with the understanding that side-effects can be dose specific as you explained, increased heart rate, I want to ask you a little bit specifically about that. How may that manifest physiologically?
DUSTIN SMITH: Well, typically the low dose of this drug you see symptoms that are more consistent with a central nervous system depressant. You see decreased heart rate. You see decreased body temperature. You see decreased --
COURT REPORTER: Can you slow down?
DUSTIN SMITH: I'm sorry. A You see decreased heart rate, decreased blood pressure, decreased body temperature. But at higher levels it does act much more like a stimulant where you may see increased heart rate, increased blood pressure and increased body temperature. Some of the things that you would expect to see with these, you know, may include agitation, confusion, potentially sweating. There also is something called excited delirium that you may experience at these higher levels, which means you might make excited gestures or comments that might be nonsensical.
SUZANNE MAYES: And may that include yelling, shouting, mood swings?
DUSTIN SMITH: Absolutely, yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: When we're talking about the excitable behavior?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct, yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: Lieutenant Smith, in addition to the physical symptoms, physiological systems and altered mental state that you described, what, if anything, do the studies indicate regarding addiction or dependency of AB Pinaca?
DUSTIN SMITH: Like I said before, unfortunately the literature on AB Pinaca is relatively limited. But the literature does state that there is an indication that this is a drug of considerable abuse potential, meaning that people could become addicted to this drug quite easily, and that the withdrawal from this drug can also be significant.
SUZANNE MAYES: What, if anything, can you tell us as a toxicologist generally about withdrawal? Can you explain the withdrawal process in relation to the substance abuse?
DUSTIN SMITH: Sure. So like I said before, when you take a drug, an illicit drug particularly, the expectation is that you're going to feel good. That's the reason why you take that drug. You want to escape realty. You want to feel better than what you're currently, you want to get away from whatever pain you might be in or what have you. If you take that drug consistently over a long period of time you develop a dependence to it. After you develop a dependence to the drug your body wants to go back to what's called homeostasis. It wants to go back to what's normal. And so, that your body actually starts to make conformational changes to the receptors in the body. So what that means is it starts to change the structure of the receptor a little bit. It makes it so the drug might not fit into the receptor quite as well anymore, so you don't get the same affect from it as you did before. So you have to take it more often and you have to take it -- take more of it, get the same affect that you were getting before. Well, unfortunately when you stop taking that drug, at that point your body is used to having that drug there to fill that receptor, and once that drug is not there anymore you may develop -- or you typically develop withdrawal systems. Where you were taking the drug before to feel good, when you don't have that drug anymore you feel bad. So you go into what's called a dysphoric state where you just, you know, feel bad all the time. And that, that dysphoric state can just be, can include depression. It can include actual physical pain. And so, those are kind of some of the things that you would expect to see from a withdrawal.
SUZANNE MAYES: If someone's been using any type of substance for a prolonged period of time, for months, how may that impact withdrawal symptoms?
DUSTIN SMITH: So the longer you use the drug and the more drug that you have to have in order to accomplish the affect that you want, the more significant the withdrawal could be when you remove that drug from the, from the body.
SUZANNE MAYES: And then you mentioned that some of the studies on AB Pinaca are limited?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct.
SUZANNE MAYES: The drug hasn't been around that long?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct, yeah. It was only around for a couple of months. It was, you know, it was very common during that time period. You know, it became scheduled, or became illegal, and then they moved on to another drug. So there wasn't a lot of time there for them to do a lot of studies on it.
SUZANNE MAYES: And so, understanding that, are the full effects of withdrawal clear regarding this particular drug, AB Pinaca?
DUSTIN SMITH: Unfortunately they are not.
SUZANNE MAYES: I'm going to show you what is State's Exhibit 58 and ask you to take a look at this, components therein.
DUSTIN SMITH: Okay.
SUZANNE MAYES: Then also State's Exhibit 70 being the results of the blood test of Timothy Ray Jones, Jr. collected on September 7th, 2014, and ask you whether or not you had a chance to review that prior to today's date.
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, I have.
SUZANNE MAYES: Okay. Lieutenant Smith, can you tell us whether or not the AB Pinaca, as noted by that blood test result, is known to be an ingredient of the street drug known as Spice?
DUSTIN SMITH: It is one of many components. Potential components, yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: I'm going to show you what is the Scooby Snax. What is labeled Scooby Snax in State's Exhibit 58.
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: And ask you whether or not that's consistent with the drug as you know it to have been sold in the State of South Carolina back in 2014.
DUSTIN SMITH: It took the form of very many synthetic cannabinoids named very many names. Scooby Snax is one of them.
SUZANNE MAYES: Okay. And this particular type of packaging, a brand known as Scooby Snax was sold right here in the State of South Carolina in various head shops at that point in time in 2014?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's my understanding, yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: And you also see a can utilized as a smoking device. Tell us what is the most common form of ingestion for this drug AB Pinaca.
DUSTIN SMITH: So smoking is the most common. The vast majority of the time when you ingest a synthetic cannabinoid it will be smoked in some way or another.
SUZANNE MAYES: Nothing further for Lieutenant Smith at this time, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Mr. Madsen.
CROSS-EXAMINATION By Mr. Madsen:
ROBERT MADSEN: Lieutenant Smith, how are you doing this morning?
DUSTIN SMITH: Good, thank you.
ROBERT MADSEN: So, Lieutenant Smith, let me see if I've got this correct. This AB Pinaca was not illegal in South Carolina until, I guess, 2015, correct?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct. January 2015.
ROBERT MADSEN: And you had said -- I guess, I'm not going to go into a head shop and say, hey, can I have some AB Pinaca? I would ask for synthetic marijuana?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct.
ROBERT MADSEN: Or Spice, or K2?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct, yes.
ROBERT MADSEN: I guess what you had said is even though it's synthetic -- or known as synthetic marijuana, it's not even close to marijuana now?
DUSTIN SMITH: Not anymore. No, it's not.
ROBERT MADSEN: And there's like 160 different varieties?
DUSTIN SMITH: There are. There have been over time. They're not 160 varieties on the market at one time. There are typically somewhere between six and fifteen different drugs that constitute what is known as synthetic cannabinoids at any given time.
ROBERT MADSEN: And I think that your testimony was that of all those different types that were like ten or eleven versions kind of down?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct. We're very far removed from the initial synthetic cannabinoids at this point.
ROBERT MADSEN: You're the expert, and correct me if I'm wrong. I think that the first synthetic cannabinoid, or the synthetic marijuana, you said that was for testing, correct?
DUSTIN SMITH: I'm sorry. I don't understand.
ROBERT MADSEN: Well, it was developed to do testing initially, something similar to kind of like marijuana?
DUSTIN SMITH: Sure. So the initial synthetic cannabinoids were created for a very useful -- well, were synthesized for a potentially a very useful thing. Marijuana interacts with two different receptors primarily. What's called a CB1 and a CB2. The CB1 is the receptor that typically gives you the euphoric effects and the CB2 has some of the peripheral effects, one of which is the increased appetite. So a lot of these drugs were being created as appetite stimulants -- or being created as potential appetite stimulants for people who had cancer or had other reasons why they weren't able to eat very well.
ROBERT MADSEN: And around '95 is when that kind of came about?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, I believe so.
ROBERT MADSEN: Wasn't it developed by a guy or started using at Clemson?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct. Dr. Hoffman at Clemson was the first person who published.
ROBERT MADSEN: And like you had said, so marijuana is a partial agonist to that CB1 receptor, correct?
DUSTIN SMITH: That is correct, yes.
ROBERT MADSEN: And so, if it's kind of like a hole and a key, it fits in there, but it's not one-hundred percent, I guess. Is that kind of a layman's term?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's --
ROBERT MADSEN: That's a partial --
DUSTIN SMITH: That's sort of the idea, yeah. If you put it, the key goes in. It still fits. But it just doesn't, it doesn't initiate the full response of the receptor.
ROBERT MADSEN: And the AB Pinaca, that's a full agonist?
DUSTIN SMITH: AB Pinaca has been shown to have a far greater receptor affinity than marijuana does. Now, whether it's a true full agonist or not I don't know. But it has -- has somewhere, there are differing reports. But somewhere between two and twenty times more affinity for the receptor than marijuana does.
ROBERT MADSEN: And all these different effects, they're going to be the same if someone with mental illness uses?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct, yeah. Sure, yes.
ROBERT MADSEN: And, in fact, there's studies that indicate that cannabinoids that it's, people with mental illness, it's even more pleasurable for them to use?
DUSTIN SMITH: Well, people with mental illness who use synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids can exacerbate the effects of mental illness.
ROBERT MADSEN: And you had indicated if you're under -- under the influence you can have slurred speech, correct?
DUSTIN SMITH: That is correct, yes.
ROBERT MADSEN: And then you had, had you done some study on some half-life's?
DUSTIN SMITH: I -- unfortunately there's not -- again, there's not a lot of information on the pharmacology of the drug. So there is, there have been some studies on half-life. A half-life is the amount of time it takes for half of the drug to be eliminated from the body. And it typically takes about seven or so half-lives for the drug to be eliminated entirely from the body. The only studies that have thus far been done on AB Pinaca. And I don't know that future studies will be done at this point because the drug is not that much of a concern today. But the only drugs that, I mean, the only studies that have been done have been done in-vitro. And what in-vitro means is that they took liver enzyme cells and they put them into a tube, and then they put the drug in and then they studied the elimination of the drug outside of the body. There have not been any studies done to the best of my knowledge, to the best of my literature search, on how the actual human body interacts with the drug.
ROBERT MADSEN: So based on those studies, the half-life of each -- or each half-life would be about 20 minutes?
DUSTIN SMITH: Approximately 20 minutes in-vitro. Now, again, that means that that's in a controlled environment. What we see in half-lives, regardless of the drug in the human body, it's fairly variable. And so, we don't know whether that half-life would be consistent with what's in the human body or not. But that is the only information that we have available to us at the time.
ROBERT MADSEN: And you said half-life is about seven?
DUSTIN SMITH: Well, it takes about seven half-lives to remove it from the body entirely. Typically it takes about five half-lives to remove it from the body so that it's lower than what most forensic laboratories can detect.
ROBERT MADSEN: So about one-hundred minutes?
DUSTIN SMITH: That's correct, based on in-vitro studies.
ROBERT MADSEN: And cannabinoids, if I was to use it today and they did a drug test, you could still -- I could not be under the influence and there could be a number of days later that you could still see in that drug test that I have used it?
DUSTIN SMITH: Are you asking in regards to traditional marijuana or are you asking in regards to synthetic cannabinoids?
ROBERT MADSEN: Both.
DUSTIN SMITH: So in regards to traditional marijuana, the tetrahydrocannabinol, which is the active component of marijuana, metabolizes into a product metabolite known as hydroxytetrahydrocannabinol --
COURT REPORTER: Wait.
DUSTIN SMITH: Sorry.
ROBERT MADSEN: I think you might need to spell it. A It metabolizes into an inactive metobolite. That inactive metabolite, depending on how often you use the drug and how much you use each time that you use it, may potentially be in your system at a detectable level for some type. Typically about three to five days if you're a very heavy user. It could be slightly longer. Unfortunately there are not studies to indicate the -- well, the metabolites have been identified for AB Pinaca, but there are not human studies that have been done to indicate the length of time that you would expect to see the AB Pinaca after the ingestion of the AB Pinaca. But again, regardless with that, it would depend on frequency of use and dose.
ROBERT MADSEN: And so, I guess in 2014 I go in, I buy -- I'm thinking I'm getting synthetic marijuana but that's not what I'm getting. I'm getting something that's, as you said, really, really different?
DUSTIN SMITH: Well, I think -- I think that is what you're getting, because I think that's what you're expecting to get. When you go into a store and you buy synthetic cannabinoids, or you buy Spice, you're expecting to get a synthetic cannabinoid. You don't know which one. You have no idea which one. But you are expecting to get a synthetic cannabinoid of some variety, and that's what he got. I mean, that's what, that's what was identified in this case.
ROBERT MADSEN: But in 2014 that's really different than marijuana?
DUSTIN SMITH: It's very different than marijuana, that's correct.
ROBERT MADSEN: That's all the questions I have.
THE COURT: Any else, Ms. Mayes?
REDIRECT EXAMINATION By Ms. Mayes:
SUZANNE MAYES: Just to follow-up a little bit, Lieutenant Smith. One of the responses you gave just a few moments ago to Mr. Madsen was that that drug, AB Pinaca, may exacerbate underlying conditions. What do the studies show in that regard?
DUSTIN SMITH: So there have been studies in regards to synthetic cannabinoids and their, their effects on those who already have underlying conditions such as anxiety, depression and mental illness. And what those studies show is that synthetic cannabinoids specifically exacerbate those effects when you're already prone to those conditions.
SUZANNE MAYES: Including persons who have underlying depression or underlying anxiety?
DUSTIN SMITH: That is correct, yes.
SUZANNE MAYES: Mr. Madsen also asked you about some of these half-life studies. Tell us a little bit more about that. What is a half-life and what are the in-vitro studies?
DUSTIN SMITH: So again, a half-life is the amount of time that it takes for half of the drug to be eliminated. So if a half-life of this particular drug in-vitro is approximately 20 minutes. That means if you take 10 milligrams of drug, after 20 minutes there would only be five milligrams left, and after 20 minutes more there would be two and half, and so on and so on. It traditionally takes about seven and a half lives for that drug to be eliminated from the body almost entirely, or to a level where it's insignificant after seven and a half lives. And then after about five and a half lives you wouldn't expect to see it in a detectable level of the body. Again, in-vitro just means that it's done outside of the body. They take liver enzyme cells, they placed them into a tube with the drug, the drub binds with those cells -- or the drug is effected by those cells, and then the metabolism that you would expect to happen within the body happens in that tube instead. Unfortunately there are a lot of things that go on in the human body that can't be replicated in that tube. Again, half-lives in the human body are quite variable, even for drugs that are very, very well studied. So you may see half-lives where the average is three to six hours. But you may see something, you know, where it's not unusual to see it from two to twelve hours. So while this study does indicate 20 minutes, the one study that was done indicates 20 minutes in vitro, that could be, that could be exactly right or it could be quite a ways away from what the true estimated value would be in the human body.
SUZANNE MAYES: So in the field of toxicology there have not been full studies regarding human subjects?
DUSTIN SMITH: Not in an AB Pinaca half-life, no.
SUZANNE MAYES: Now, is it your opinion that a prolonged user of AB Pinaca may experience symptoms of withdrawal?
DUSTIN SMITH: Yes, it is my opinion that --
ROBERT MADSEN: Objection, that is beyond cross.
SUZANNE MAYES: I believe it goes to the issues of the half-life, Your Honor.
THE COURT: I'll allow it. We're getting close to going beyond. So he can answer it. A I'm sorry. Can you repeat the question?
SUZANNE MAYES: Yes. It is your opinion as an expert in the field of toxicology that a prolonged user of AB Pinaca may experience symptoms of withdrawal?
DUSTIN SMITH: So, yes, someone who's a chronic user of a synthetic cannabinoid such as AB Pinaca after some amount of time will build up some tolerance to that drug. That tolerance, once the drug is then removed from the body, from the equation, would almost certainly cause some level of withdrawal.
SUZANNE MAYES: Thank you, Lieutenant Smith, nothing further.
THE COURT: All right. You may step down.
DUSTIN SMITH: Thank you. (Whereupon, the witness stepped down from the witness stand.)
THE COURT: Let's take about 15 minutes. Don't discuss the case. (Whereupon, the jury was excused from open court for a break.)
(Whereupon, a short break was taken.)
THE COURT: Let's bring them in. (Whereupon, the jury came into open court at approximately 11:20 a.m.)
THE COURT: All right. We're ready to go back to work. Ms. Mayes.
SUZANNE MAYES: Yes, sir, Your Honor. The State calls Kennan Frederick.